Electric aircraft and bumblebees cannot fly

electric1 | eTurboNews | eTN
Electric aircraft - like bumblebees?

For decades the theoreticians proved that bumblebees could not fly and were extremely irritated that they continued to fly anyway – using different equations. Much the same thing is happening with fixed-wing battery-electric aircraft. They were supposed to be impossible, but over one hundred are up there with around 1000 on order.

  1. These are small so they do not even need a new principle of flying.
  2. They just copy the Tesla approach with cars down below.
  3. In a report by IDTechEx, “Manned Electric Aircraft: Smart City and Regional 2021-2041,” these electric fixed-wing aircraft as well as analysis of radical new electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft designs are detailed.

The host of small improvements usually multiply. Two 10% improvements benefit by 21% and the choice of improvements is vast. People wrongly think that a Tesla gets record range from a better battery, but equally important is safely running the battery nearer to its limit, eliminating thousands of parts, and other detail. Range is even more desirable with small aircraft because range is a safety factor, so the aviators also seek 0.2 drag factor, eliminating one kilometer of cabling, hundreds of parts, and inefficient motors and power electronics.

electric2 | eTurboNews | eTN

Faced with reality, the naysayers of small electric aircraft now turn their attention to larger electric aircraft and vertical take-off being impossible. They have some point, because we are currently in a silly season where many imprudent proposals attract a shower of money from eyes-shut investors hoping for the next Tesla. Theoreticians were right to point out that one design with a thruster on each wing tip and nothing in-between would fling itself out of the sky when one failed. They are right to caution that with currently available parts, many multirotor VTOL fall out of the sky in 60 minutes from takeoff – no glide and not even parachute deployment at that height. City air taxi economics are rightly questioned in the report, “Air Taxis: Electric Vertical Take-Off and Landing Aircraft 2021-2041.”  

Many are pivoting to VTOL with fixed wings, so they can fly as regular aircraft most of the time, endure longer, and, in some cases, glide in an emergency. One example is UK startup Vertical Aerospace floating at $2.2 billion following Virgin Atlantic and American Airlines placing orders for 1,000 of its fixed-wing VTOL – several billion dollars despite nothing yet in the air.

Contrast helicopters are inherently more efficient in vertical flight but without redundant thrusters and stability in wind. They help to erect high-rise buildings, hovering for one hour at a time. No battery VTOL can do that: they must address minimal hover business cases.

Back with conventional takeoff and landing fixed-wing aircraft, there are bumblebee-like calculations warning that none of the planned 8- to 100-seat versions promised for 2026-2030 can fly. They use the wrong equations because 2 use the very different principle of ground effect and many others use the new principle of distributed thrust DT, involving multiple propellers along the wing. DT means dispensing with flaps and a large percentage of weight, space, material cost, drag, and runway length. NASA and DLR calculations and experiments support this. United Airlines is planning to launch electric aircraft by 2026.

The naysayers are also wrong because they ignore the “every little bit helps” approach for the larger aircraft. For example, today’s polluting regional aircraft have 30 km of wiring and poor drag factor but a born-electric one is like a Tesla. Tesla range comes substantially from regenerative braking and the aircraft equivalent is propellers reversing on descent and wheels that regenerate on landing. Indeed, powered wheels can make electric aircraft taxi and takeoff more efficient.  

Let us consider one example. Bye Aerospace has over 720 orders – over $250 million, with deliveries about to commence – from flying schools and air taxi operators for its 2- and 4-seat battery aircraft you can test fly today. It recently announced an 8-passenger battery-electric aircraft on a similar “lowest total-cost-of-ownership” pitch, but the 500 nm range (loaded) was announced as dependent on a partnership with Oxis Energy for a new battery. The naysayers grinned when Oxis promptly went belly up. However, the giant LGChem is on a similar timescale to supply a similar battery and, like Tesla, Bye never was relying on one battery. They do the grunt work on all the little improvements. The following aspects of the specification reveal some of this and also the multiple safety features beyond even its long glide, emergency autolanding system and aircraft parachute.  

This eFlyer 800 design is entirely new from tip to tail. Aerodynamic efficiency is twice that of a typical legacy turboprop aircraft of similar size – high overall propulsive-system efficiency with high motor efficiency with low cooling drag, 2 wing-mounted electric motors each with dual-redundant motor windings and quad-redundant battery packs. Modest range increases are offered from optional supplemental power solar cells (probably the satellite-grade that they trialed – it produces double the electricity of today’s solar cars and aircraft) and in-wheel electric taxi.

Jet It, and JetClub, fractional ownership sister companies in North America and Europe respectively, have signed a multi-billion-dollar purchase agreement for a fleet of eFlyer 800 aircraft. In addition, L3Harris Technologies and Bye Aerospace have signed an agreement to develop an all-electric, multi-mission variant that will provide intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance (ISR) capabilities.

For now, Bye Aerospace is not doing a bumblebee with a new principle of flying, but it can add distributed propulsion at a time of its choosing. Meanwhile, all battery-electric aircraft climb faster than polluting propeller-driven ones just as Teslas accelerate faster. Just be careful about saying that no battery-electric business – or regional aircraft can fly. There is a bumblebee smiling at you from above.    

About the author

Avatar of Linda Hohnholz, eTN editor

Linda Hohnholz, eTN editor

Linda Hohnholz has been writing and editing articles since the start of her working career. She has applied this innate passion to such places as Hawaii Pacific University, Chaminade University, the Hawaii Children's Discovery Center, and now TravelNewsGroup.

Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x
Share to...