Read us | Listen to us | Watch us | Join Live Events | Turn Off Ads | Live |

Click on your language to translate this article:

Afrikaans Afrikaans Albanian Albanian Amharic Amharic Arabic Arabic Armenian Armenian Azerbaijani Azerbaijani Basque Basque Belarusian Belarusian Bengali Bengali Bosnian Bosnian Bulgarian Bulgarian Cebuano Cebuano Chichewa Chichewa Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified) Corsican Corsican Croatian Croatian Czech Czech Dutch Dutch English English Esperanto Esperanto Estonian Estonian Filipino Filipino Finnish Finnish French French Frisian Frisian Galician Galician Georgian Georgian German German Greek Greek Gujarati Gujarati Haitian Creole Haitian Creole Hausa Hausa Hawaiian Hawaiian Hebrew Hebrew Hindi Hindi Hmong Hmong Hungarian Hungarian Icelandic Icelandic Igbo Igbo Indonesian Indonesian Italian Italian Japanese Japanese Javanese Javanese Kannada Kannada Kazakh Kazakh Khmer Khmer Korean Korean Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Lao Lao Latin Latin Latvian Latvian Lithuanian Lithuanian Luxembourgish Luxembourgish Macedonian Macedonian Malagasy Malagasy Malay Malay Malayalam Malayalam Maltese Maltese Maori Maori Marathi Marathi Mongolian Mongolian Myanmar (Burmese) Myanmar (Burmese) Nepali Nepali Norwegian Norwegian Pashto Pashto Persian Persian Polish Polish Portuguese Portuguese Punjabi Punjabi Romanian Romanian Russian Russian Samoan Samoan Scottish Gaelic Scottish Gaelic Serbian Serbian Sesotho Sesotho Shona Shona Sindhi Sindhi Sinhala Sinhala Slovak Slovak Slovenian Slovenian Somali Somali Spanish Spanish Sudanese Sudanese Swahili Swahili Swedish Swedish Tajik Tajik Tamil Tamil Thai Thai Turkish Turkish Ukrainian Ukrainian Urdu Urdu Uzbek Uzbek Vietnamese Vietnamese Xhosa Xhosa Yiddish Yiddish Zulu Zulu

Human Rights Violation in New Zealand against Foreign Tourists?

In Hawaii, they call it Kamaaina Rates, in Indonesia hotel rates for locals, are highly discounted, but in New Zealand, such advantages are human rights violations under United Nations treaties.

This is according to an Australian woman blaming the New Zealand Department of Conservation in breaching international human rights by charging foreigners double the price Kiwis (locals)  pay to use huts along popular walking tracks.

Wendy Faulkner says the unfair fees could be a “slippery slope” leading to more insidious forms of discrimination and has taken her complaint to the United Nations.

She earlier complained to New Zealand’s Human Rights Commission in July after being charged $130 a night to stay in DOC huts on the Routeburn Track, near Milford Sound, while her Kiwi citizen husband David paid just $65.

The HRC accepted the complaint and acted as a mediator between Faulkner and DOC.

While New Zealand’s Human Rights Act does not allow discrimination against another person based on their nationality, Faulkner’s husband David said they discovered the Government had an exemption under Section 153 of the Act.

It’s clearly unlawful under the New Zealand Human Rights Act.

New Zealand Government discrimination against non-citizens may hurt the New Zealand travel and tourism industry.

Faulkner said the fact the Government had different rules under the Human Rights Act compared to everyone else was a cause for wider concern.

Having been born in New Zealand but lived in Australia since he was 6, Faulkner has been a long-term advocate for the rights of Kiwis.

He said that the Australian Government also had been progressively introducing ever more discriminatory policies against Kiwis since 2001.

He said a country signing up to international treaties on human rights can decide who can vote in elections and who can enter their territory, but apart from that should treat everyone equally before the law.

DOC introduced the higher fees for foreigners using huts along four of New Zealand’s nine Great Walks earlier this year as part of a seven-month trial, running from October 2018 to April 2019.

They include huts along the Milford Track, Kepler, Routeburn, and Abel Tasman Coastal Walk.

New Zealand Conservation Minister Eugenie Sage said at the time the trial was designed to ease pressure on the walks from high visitor numbers and to help recoup an extra $2.9 million in revenue.

Having two rates is routine in many countries. In Thailand, citizens don’t pay fees to visit National Monuments, but tourists do. The argument could be locals will use services constantly, but tourists only have a short time to enjoy and should pay a premium. Tourism, after all, is business.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email