Click to join an upcoming live event

Turn off Ads (click)

Click on your language to translate this article:

Afrikaans Afrikaans Albanian Albanian Amharic Amharic Arabic Arabic Armenian Armenian Azerbaijani Azerbaijani Basque Basque Belarusian Belarusian Bengali Bengali Bosnian Bosnian Bulgarian Bulgarian Catalan Catalan Cebuano Cebuano Chichewa Chichewa Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Simplified) Chinese (Traditional) Chinese (Traditional) Corsican Corsican Croatian Croatian Czech Czech Danish Danish Dutch Dutch English English Esperanto Esperanto Estonian Estonian Filipino Filipino Finnish Finnish French French Frisian Frisian Galician Galician Georgian Georgian German German Greek Greek Gujarati Gujarati Haitian Creole Haitian Creole Hausa Hausa Hawaiian Hawaiian Hebrew Hebrew Hindi Hindi Hmong Hmong Hungarian Hungarian Icelandic Icelandic Igbo Igbo Indonesian Indonesian Irish Irish Italian Italian Japanese Japanese Javanese Javanese Kannada Kannada Kazakh Kazakh Khmer Khmer Korean Korean Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kurdish (Kurmanji) Kyrgyz Kyrgyz Lao Lao Latin Latin Latvian Latvian Lithuanian Lithuanian Luxembourgish Luxembourgish Macedonian Macedonian Malagasy Malagasy Malay Malay Malayalam Malayalam Maltese Maltese Maori Maori Marathi Marathi Mongolian Mongolian Myanmar (Burmese) Myanmar (Burmese) Nepali Nepali Norwegian Norwegian Pashto Pashto Persian Persian Polish Polish Portuguese Portuguese Punjabi Punjabi Romanian Romanian Russian Russian Samoan Samoan Scottish Gaelic Scottish Gaelic Serbian Serbian Sesotho Sesotho Shona Shona Sindhi Sindhi Sinhala Sinhala Slovak Slovak Slovenian Slovenian Somali Somali Spanish Spanish Sudanese Sudanese Swahili Swahili Swedish Swedish Tajik Tajik Tamil Tamil Telugu Telugu Thai Thai Turkish Turkish Ukrainian Ukrainian Urdu Urdu Uzbek Uzbek Vietnamese Vietnamese Welsh Welsh Xhosa Xhosa Yiddish Yiddish Yoruba Yoruba Zulu Zulu
Travel News

Beijing court fails to issue decision on legal case between Ctrip and Qunar

gavelonbooks
Avatar
Written by editor

BEIJING – In the latest round of legal proceedings between Ctrip, a leading online travel agency, and Qunar, China’s leading travel search engine, the People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing faile

BEIJING – In the latest round of legal proceedings between Ctrip, a leading online travel agency, and Qunar, China’s leading travel search engine, the People’s Court of Haidian District, Beijing failed to come to a decision regarding the case filed by Ctrip. Ctrip believes that Qunar willingly broke copyright regulations pertaining to Ctrip, and the company also denied any possibility of an out-of-court settlement.

Ctrip is attempting to claim that Qunar’s search, partial display, and linking back to Ctrip’s web site of user-generated comments constitute a rights violation. Thus, having failed in their requests to have Qunar desist from this practice, Ctrip decided to take the issue to the courts, filing in August of this year.

Ctrip’s attorney states that user-generated comments, as originally posted on Ctrip’s web site, belong to Ctrip, and as such are copyrighted. It is, therefore, their belief that Qunar has the legal obligation to cease and desist from the practice of searching, partially displaying, and linking back to Ctrip’s web site, while also covering the costs of litigation that amount to RMB1,000. “According to internet by-laws here in China, the accused would have been exempt from liability had they deleted the comments at the first time of asking. But, unfortunately, the other party failed to respond accordingly,” said Ctrip’s attorney.

It is Qunar’s belief, however, that no copyright laws have been broken. Qunar’s attorney states that there are three clear reasons why Qunar has not violated any copyright laws. First, what Qunar provided is only a crawl of user-generated comments rather than a full reprinting, which is consistent with practices followed by search engines in China and other countries. Also, Qunar sources user-generated comments from various travel web sites, including eLong.com. Additionally, there is no clear statement by Ctrip nor do its user terms and conditions declare in any way that user-generated comments are copyrighted. And finally, such user-generated comments by their very nature cannot be constituted as copyrightable works, hence, it is not appropriate to talk of copyright violations with regards to such items.

Previously, Ctrip had also brought a lawsuit against Qunar to the Administration for Industry and Commerce at the beginning of 2007, demanding that Qunar remove its advanced price comparison tool from its web site. In the same year, Shanghai Lanbao Travel Service Co., Ltd. was also accused of a rights violation and was asked by Ctrip to delete relative information. At the time of the Lanbao case, there was a comment released in the Chinese domestic media pointing out that Ctrip, as an industry pioneer, is compelled to “protect itself from enemies everywhere” due to fierce competition in the online travel industry.